Incorporation of Advanced Technology into Operation

Introduction

Australian Forestry International (AFI) is self-employed and registered in July 2003. The International  Agency (ABSDO) Accreditation Committee has recognized the AFL as the Standard Development Agency (SDO). Only five SDOs, the Australian business model, have recognition and approval for the development and management of Australian standards. The government recognizes Australian standards as Australia's highest standard. Coordinates standardization activities, develops International Standards (ISO), Australian International, which deliver a net benefit to Australia, and facilitate the recognition of other International development agencies through AFI.

Background of the Study

All International  developed by AFSL are published by Standard Australia in conjunction with the SAI Global Disclosure Agreement. The Australian Forest Standard (AS4708-2007) and the Stop Chain Standard (AS4707 - 2006) are one of the Australian Forest International  (AS) and the forest chain. Achievement of the standards is achieved through their status as Australian forests and timber products recognized by independent and third parties: • ABSO, the independent body responsible for Australian Government accreditation. . , • External Certification Bodies / Auditors (JAS-ANZ) are recognized by independent auditors in Australia and New Zealand; The Forest Confirmation Program (PEFC) focuses on sustainable forest management and management rights, and more than ninety-five percent (10.2 million hectares) of Australia's large (natural and vegetable) forests are independently licensed in a coordinated manner.s

Project  goals and Objectives

AFI focuses on developing its relationship with the industry by providing credible and respected Australian-signed standards that meet the needs of all stakeholders. We strive to maintain Australian forestry standards, supported and endorsed by key stakeholders, including growers, processors, retailers, consumers, industry organizations, and government agencies. • No operating profit or activity is associated with the development, management, or maintenance of Australian International. • Standards for body position, AFSL, and certification are completely different. The Australian certificate is free and is provided by independent third-party certification bodies. • Compromises of registered trademarks can be ordered by authorized organizations to label and meet their requirements for their timber and timber products. The Protected Marks have been fully reviewed for use in Australia and approved by the ACCC and are audited and used by independent certification authorities.

The scope of AFI accreditation as a standard development agency in ABSO is the development of Australian forestry standards for timber production. These two existing Australian standards provide an integrated solution that includes sustainable forestry of origin and sustainable forestry through the supply chain. Demand for best practices in forest management and timber and timber supply chain monitoring has grown in line with increased consumer demand. Environmental information is directly influenced by environmental information, climate change, illegal logging and leading daily and international action plans. The role of Australian Forestry International  (AFI) is to establish and maintain Australian International , which provide the structure and processes for monitoring and promoting sustainable forestry and the use of sustainable forest products.

Project Planning Schedule and Milestones

To create a community forest, the community must first identify, especially who should be included. It is also important to resolve any conflicting resource requests, such as forestry versus environmental concerns. Forest resources should also take into account local requirements and cultural interests. Only then can local institutions be established for community participation in forest management. Establishing a meaningful process for involving the community in regional planning requires a long and lengthy effort, including establishing new communication channels, identifying local leaders and developing the report needed for large exchanges between different stakeholder groups (Poffenberger and Selin, 1998). A public forest can only function if the government wants to and can experiment with new ideas and, if necessary, adapts to forest policy and legislation and the political commitment to decentralization. An appropriate institutional structure should be created, along with some key figures from forestry authorities who are truly community forestry. In addition, local residents from the grass level should see an advantage in working with other interest groups to gain greater control over forest resources.

Gantt Chart

WBS

There must be long-term and focused cooperation between communities and governments, reliable financing, strong leadership and comprehensive awareness. Community forests become a viable approach to forest management only when and when these conditions are met. As new forest needs emerge, new management models, such as community forests, may be needed to address the changing social relationships in their forests. Public forestry is a means to achieve much desired results, i.e. greater responsibility for public and industrial forests, significant opportunities for local people to share responsibility for forest management and, I hope, more diverse and healthy forests that provide offer various benefits to society. Lessons learned from case studies and other lessons can help create community forests in Australia when needed.

Project Cost/budget

Education - Basic forest management education for the community is critical for all stages of community forest development and should be regulated by forest authorities. Allocation of resources and support. Engagement at all levels is a key element in successful community forestry. This commitment is required on three levels: funding, personnel and the community. First, funding should continue in accordance with the joint agreement of the forestry community. Second, staff must focus on creating and maintaining a community forest, since one of the major challenges is working effectively with the government (i.e. the relationship between the community and the government). Finally, local residents must have confidence and dedication to both work and maintain their forests and develop good public relations. Community-based "forestry" initiatives, rather than public initiatives, tend to be more sustainable and successful. The challenge is to develop foundations that make it possible to make extensive use of the lessons learned from successful community initiatives. All eleven case studies presented above demonstrate different levels of success and limitations of the community forest (discussed in Table 1 below). The analysis of each community forest case study was subjective as insight into the effectiveness of each case study was obtained from secondary data. The analysis is divided into three broad categories: good, medium and limited.

 

Activity	Actual cost ($)	Final cost ($s)
/project /implementation	3000	3000
resource Gathering	2000	2000
installation	1500	1500
.implementation	3000	3000

 

Risks management

In this unit, the average growing forest stock is about 300 m3 /ha. The main tree species of this growing stand are conifers (71%); at least 37% of the cultivation area consists of trees with a diameter of more than 40 cm (Dargavel,2016). In conifers, the pine tree is mainly pine (50% of the growth phase), in the case of deciduous trees the trees (25% of the growth phase). Ten percent of the growing stock is larch, which is mixed with pine and beech trees at higher altitudes. Growing reserves and growth are higher in private forests, mainly due to the smaller share of protective forests. This unit is dominated by large timber and is also characterized by a number of well-preserved forests. The total length of all roads in the Solþava unit is 107.3 km. There are nearly 60 km of forest roads in private forests, while the state forest runs 10.6 km from these roads.

The average density of forest tracks per unit is 15.7 m / ha, while the average density of private forests is 41 m / ha. Further deforestation is limited by agricultural conditions and restrictions on the construction of forest infrastructure in protected areas. One and a half centuries ago, one third of the territory of today's Solþava community was covered with forest. It was home to 796 inhabitants, bred 749 cattle, 246 pigs, 812 sheep, and 5 horses ( Nicholls,2016). At that time Solþava was an integral part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; Wood, hence forests, was of no importance except for personal use in building and heating farms and cooking (Arnould,2020). Thanks to this predominantly self-sufficient lifestyle, farms have focused on highly developed livestock and crops. One hundred years later, the community counted 472 cattle, 11 dairy cows, and 131 pigs on a 2000 farm on a 53-farm (Dernulc, 2002). These farms use 5,108 hectares of land, of which 681 hectares are used for agriculture. These arable lands are mainly meadows and pastures, the arable land and vegetable gardens cover only 2226 hectares. Cereal fields do not. The closed nature of these forests also determined the technology of slip. According to Robanov Jože (Vršnik, 1978), during the summer, the cut-out is followed by manual sliding into large piles near canals and estuaries, using hooks (lifting hooks) and then waiting for the winter season.

HR/Resourcess

The heavy snowfall, followed by the rapid arrival of spring and the immediate rise in temperature, is a favorable condition for the release of large avalanches that smoothed the cavities, edges, and rocks (soil slides) in the canals (Wang,2020). The Lumberjacks had to use the right time to remove the snow trunks and set off from their avalanches along and above the walls. If they could get half of the tree trunks under the intact walls as the snow melts, they would be very happy. In rainy weather or the following winter, they were slid by hand under the walls in a place accessible to cattle. Another way to glide is along a wet or frozen depression, floating freely (wooden float [other streams on the Bela stream and Savinja bank]). The timber was transported to the selected sawmill, from where the buyer took the timber, marked it and paid for it. It may have been several years since the actual logging, and the cost of slipping and the loss and devaluation of the timber often far exceeded the taxes received. The proceeds were then invested in the construction of roads, buildings and the removal of rock from the land. The logging technology described above required a lot of time, manpower, and sufficient manpower. As elsewhere in the mid-20th century, technology underwent significant changes in the Solþava region. The increase in the number of tractors, chainsaws and kilometers traveled on the forest road also indirectly affects the number of people employed in the forestry sector in Sol .ava. This number of employees decreased from 40 in 1961 to 27 in 1985 and to only 4 in 1997. In addition, a forest management unit with a capacity of more than 15,000 m3 currently has a forest manager.

Communication managements plan

The first and second tier of forest owners accounted for only 0.9% of the Australian  forest area, accounting for approximately 36.3% of forest owners. Small forest owners often lose the role of proponents of technological development (local entrepreneurs, human resources)s. For example, the first two fields of the forest owner (*) were removed from the list of conditional links, but the relationship was not violated in the context of the relationship. Knowledge. Three- and four-dimensional (**) conditions were combined as a result of the three-dimensional spatial expansion to produce a multidimensional uniform forest cover. The fourth part of the study concerns those living in Slovenia outside the country of study. Now the Soviet covers 25.3% of the forest area. Since the relationship between protocol / production and technological development of trees was used differently from humans, it was analyzed differently. In many societies involving hundreds or thousands of owners, clinical research has shown the need to work effectively (Medved, 2002). When serving a small population of transgender families, we are based on our experience and background, including at least ten samples in one group. After partial forestry, tests were conducted on 84 families in 75% of the second forest and 50% of the other households in the first forest; this is different for families in Australian  districts and for families living abroad. In the interviews, each family participated in the third part of the forest. In the fourth phase, ten families in the village of Australian  are religiously selected.

Internal communication  Plan

Medium	Activity	Responsibility	Frequency
sharepoint	sharing document	PO	high
Email	sharing information and document	All	high
video calling	discussion	All	High
meetings	Members	All	for All

 

External Stakeholder Plan

 

Medium	Activity	Responsibility	Frequency
sharepoint	sharing document	PO	high
Email	sharing information and document	All	high
video calling	discussion	All	High
Site visiting	Members	managers	highly required

Quality Plan

 The final interview list consisted of 63 chapters, and the family was divided equally into four sections (see Table 5). For many, the information is based on a description of the state of the forest before the study. The last classification of family and individual groups was made after the interview when the owner provided an update on the condition of the property.

Most households surveyed (97 percent) use wood to produce electricity, but only 81 percent of households heat their facilities with just fuel. In 11 cases, wood is just an additional combustible material. In addition to the most important buildings with an average age of 90 years and an average size of 200 m2, 12 cases have other residential property in homes. The heating season lasts on average 7 months. Most of the households interviewed (74 percent) have a central heating system in their home. Twenty percent of households surveyed still heat individual appliances, namely a rusty brick kiln or pottery. Regarding data on the balance of trees in homes, it was concluded that the families interviewed used 1,297 m3 of wood per year for heating and cooking. The smallest diameter of wood used as fuel is on average 5 cm. Houses that only heat their homes with wood use 1,078 m3 of wood for heating. They use an average of 23 m3 of wood annually. Annual or 0.2 m3 per year. M2 of residential area, or 472 kWh / m2, is more than double the average energy consumption per year. M2 in class-built buildings (189 kWh / m2). The lowest wood consumption for heating is found in homes with an automatic heating method (15 m3 / year). There are differences between groups of using wood for energy consumption, but statistically there are only between XL and OUT regions and between M and OUT (test F, ? = 0.05). About 38 percent of participants plan to change the heating techniques in the future. Changes to the heating system are planned for most people who do not yet have central heating. Many participants (12) believe that the system uses its own pieces of wood. Many are not considering buying a modern ticket boiler. Only one partner intends to use fossil fuels in the future. Participants constructed 31 sources of information on wood manufacturing, processing, and use. Most of them consider the most important information on: tree prices, demand for timber, timber sales, forestry, tooling, service provision, and woodworking. Other information is also mentioned: timber, forest prices, permitted annual logging, contractors, logging, management plan, logging, forestry, road construction, training, payment methods, timber, transportation of timber, use of wood for timber, -cropping, forest system, tree planting, forest wildlife status, subsidies, heating technology, labor safety and security measures, environmental protection, forest road maintenance, and CIS. Combining the price of timber, lumber, timber revenue and demand from timber buyers, the joint information section on timber sales reached (55 percent of responses). The sources of the most important information - the price of wood - are mainly wood buyers (78 percent of respondents); only 5 percent are rangers for public forest service; and 8 percent of respondents find such information in a newspaper or on the Internet. Access to information is considered good in 58 percent of cases, 30 percent as bad, and only 5 percent consider access very good. Owners of larger forest areas were less satisfied with access to information and efficiency in communication channels for harvesting/processing timber. The level of formal education of the forest owners interviewed can be compared with the Slovenian rural average. Sol?ava currently has no formal educational ability, and a similar situation exists in neighboring Luþe. The educational infrastructure is underdeveloped for informal educational approaches. CIS cannot cover education in owner-critical categories (tree marketing). Forest owners read very little and rarely talk about the technological problems in timber production. Apparently, they underestimate the importance of the latest information on wood cutting and skating and combustion production capabilities. 

Procurement Plan

Income from waste sales representing the large Australian  family has declined significantly due to the high technology used in harvest / timber production. On average, people who know forests know about 75 percent of the harvest. Rainforests are well managed, the average amount of precipitation is 3.3 m3 / ha. The annual growth rate of 100 hectares was below 1.9 m3 / hectare. Apart from local owners, the forest is heavily regulated (1.5 m3 / ha / year), which indicates that it is very dependent on forest income. Timber prices have remained stable in the market for years. However, the cost of labor and materials for growing timber has increased sharply, as a result many farms will be more than three years old and future revenues will be low. . In addition to reducing the cost of wood production, the company is seeking solutions to obtain better wood, as well as supplying wood products and services. Mets. On golfers returning to the highlight forests, however, this Australian  is not a real candidate for grass production. The state of Sol?ava forestry does not include forest use, but complex rules may apply to its proper use. Many local communities live in the forests. Forests are also aware of the role of forests in land protection, water resources and tourism development, but currently have no economic benefits. While some Logarska project branches must comply with product, timber and forestry regulations, forest owners must increase the productivity of the production process through technological advances. .

Recommendations and Conclusion

 Technology-related forest development is not only a problem affecting disposable forests, but is also part of the strategic plan for the whole city of Sol. With the development of technology, it is possible to achieve the goals of forest development, tourism and nature protection and community development, and also to build the Savinjska community on behalf of partners. sale of large timber, seven timber and wooden boards. 90 percent of the loops are hidden. Most boards are small, most boards are useless. Buy individually adjustable tables for a buyer from the point of view of the owners. Generally, it can be up to 50 hectares of wood, forest and forest areas. Those who do not cooperate in timber sales. Large houses are also trying to find other wood for sale. In their searches, some will use the Internet, which will become increasingly important in the future. Large fabrics are purchased from almost every home and garden. Less than a third of people buy wood, but only 17 percent of households sell wood for comfort. It is almost like solid wood in autumn. Among the interviewees, there were not many open forestry and the use of firewood was missing.

Signoff

 The leaves are usually sold by permanent workers with a farm of more than 50 hectares, as in the forestry  industry. Sixty-six percent of the participants agreed to the idea of ??establishing a state restaurant in Sol?ava. There is a lot of interest here, as many farms are particularly concerned with financing such facilities. Half of the participants agree to sign a long-term contract to supply the paper, but very few people are responsible for the size of the forest.

References

Arnould, M., Morel, L. and Fournier, M., 2020, February. Living lab organization and practices as useful tools to stimulate innovation in forestry practices. In Governing and managing forests for multiple ecosystem services across the globe.

Bartlett, A.G., 2018. Factors Affecting Success in International Collaborative Forestry Research Projects.

Bartlett, A.G., 2018. Factors affecting the success of collaborative forestry research in Papua New Guinea. Australian Forestry, 81(2), pp.116-128.

Brack, C.L., 2019. Forestry education that goes beyond the standard and unoriginal.

Dargavel, J., 2016. An initial inventory of Australian foresters’ lives. Australian Forestry, 79(4), pp.265-270.

Gibson, C. and Warren, A., 2018. Unintentional path dependence: Australian guitar manufacturing, bunya pine and legacies of forestry decisions and resource stewardship. Australian Geographer, 49(1), pp.61-80.

Lazar, N., 2016. Sustainability reporting and practice in the Australian forestry industry: an environmental NGO approach.

Liu, N., Harper, R.J., Dell, B., Liu, S. and Yu, Z., 2017. Vegetation dynamics and rainfall sensitivity for different vegetation types of the Australian continent in the dry period 2002–2010. Ecohydrology, 10(2), p.e1811.

Newman, R.L., 2018. Mechanisms for private sector investment in plantation forestry in Australia.

Nicholls, D., 2016. SCU Forestry School-foresters for the worlds' forests. Australian Forest Grower, 39, p.44.

Wang, W., 2020. What is under these dying trees? An urban soil environment survey. Australian Forestry, pp.1-1.

Xu, J., Hardy, L.L., Guo, C.Z. and Garnett, S.P., 2018. The trends and prevalence of obesity and morbid obesity among Australian school?aged children, 1985–2014. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 54(8), pp.907-912.